A Nuclear Submariner Challenges a Pro-Nuclear Film
Thanks to Paul Hawken for sharing this on social media.
TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE:
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/16/a-nuclear-submariner-challenges-a-pro-nuclear-film/?smid=go-share&_r=1&
By ANDREW C. REVKIN
TO READ THE FULL ARTICLE:
http://dotearth.blogs.nytimes.com/2013/08/16/a-nuclear-submariner-challenges-a-pro-nuclear-film/?smid=go-share&_r=1&
John Dudley Miller, a former nuclear engineering officer in the Navy with a doctorate in social psychology and a long career in journalism, sent this “Your Dot” critique of “Pandora’s Promise,” the new documentary defending nuclear power, and the more recent videotaped discussion of nuclear energy by the climate scientist and campaigner James E. Hansen [Updated, 12:27 p.m. |Hansen has responded below.]:
When I saw “Pandora’s Promise,” I didn’t believe a word of it. I served as a submarine nuclear engineering officer for my four-year stint in the Navy years ago. I qualified as an Engineering Officer of the Watch (a guy who’s in charge of the plant and its other technicians during four-hour shifts) on two different sub reactors. I know the truth about reactors, and the movie replaces it with the demonstrably false Nuclear Dream, a just-so mythical story claiming that nukes are safe, clean and cheap.
Etiquetas: Andrew Revkin, Energy, eng, James Hansen, Lynas, New York Times, Nuclear, Stewart Brand
